The San Antonio Court of Appeals recently ruled in a workplace retaliation matter.  Martinez v. Wilson County, No. 04-09-00233-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio January 13, 2010, no pet. h.), available at http://www.4thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopinion.asp?OpinionId=22680.

The plaintiff alleged she had been wrongfully terminated for complaining about a gender-based hostile work environment.  Her employer alleged that the plaintiff’s employment had been terminated for misconduct.  The trial court granted summary judgment for the employer.

To prove a retaliation claim, a plaintiff must show: (1) she engaged in a protected activity; (2) an adverse action occurred; and (3) a causal connection exists between the plaintiff’s participation in a protected activity and the adverse employment action.  Protected activities include: (1) opposing a discriminatory practice; (2) making or filing a charge of discrimination; (3) filing a complaint; or (4) testifying, assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing.  Here, the plaintiff complained of a hostile work environment, but she did not suggest that her concerns were gender-related.  Because her complaints did not put her employer on notice that she had gender-related concerns and because the content of her complaints would not support an inference that she was engaging in a protected activity, the plaintiff could not show that she engaged in a protected activity.  Thus, summary judgment was appropriate.

To speak to an attorney who handles discrimination law questions, please contact the employment lawyers at Clouse Dunn Khoshbin LLP at [email protected]

Press Release Contact Information:

KEITH A. CLOUSE

Clouse Dunn Khoshbin LLP

214.220.2722

214.220.3833 ( fax)

[email protected]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: