• About Us
  • Home
Friday, August 19, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
WiredNewsEngine
  • Home
  • Press Release
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Legal
  • Business
  • Featured
  • Current
  • Home
  • Press Release
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Legal
  • Business
  • Featured
  • Current
No Result
View All Result
WiredNewsEngine
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal

Los Angeles California entertainment: Hannah Montana creators sue for $5M

by WebMaster
April 12, 2010
in Legal, Press Release
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Legal news for California entertainment attorneys. Two co-creators of Disney’s Hannah Montana sue the entertainment giant for unpaid profits.

California entertainment lawyers alert- Disney faces lawsuit over Hannah Montana compensation.

Los Angeles, CA—Two of the creators or the hit Disney Channel television show “Hannah Montana,” have filed a lawsuit against the network for over $5 million in profits resulting from the show. The suit, which was filed on Friday, April 9, 2010 in the Los Angeles Superior Court, asserts that the creators have been denied their fair share of the successful tween show, as reported by MSNBC.

The co-creators, Barry O’Brien and Richard Correll, created the highly profitable Miley Cyrus series with Michael Poryes in 2005. The plaintiff’s claim they are owned millions in pre-negotiated percentage-based bonuses as outlined in their back-end agreements and according to the Writers Guild of American mandates. The suit contends Disney has repeatedly denied requests for payment and “thwarted attempts to audit profits from the show.”

In addition to the unpaid profits, Correll claims he was wrongfully fired from the show, and has been “blackballed” from future directing jobs at Disney after he testified in connection with the arbitration. The lawsuit contends, “The real reason for Defendants’ termination and blackballing of Correll was Disney’s desire to retaliate” against him “for a) seeking compensation owing to Correll” and O’Brien and “b) their testimony against Disney in the WGA Arbitration.” The duo was apparently fighting with Disney in WGA arbitration about the studios obligations to them “under certain provision of the WGA Agreement with respect to the series.”

The suit names Walt Disney Pictures, ABC Cable Networks Group, Disney Channel, producers Bigwood Films, Fuss Budget Films, Silver Creek Pictures and It’s a Laugh Prods as the defendants.

Poryes also sued Disney for similar allegations in October 2008.

Legal News Reporter: Nicole Howley-Legal news for California entertainment lawyers.

WebMaster

WebMaster

Next Post

Drug Injury News: Baby deaths result in $110M settlement for E-Ferol lawsuit

Popular News

  • Silencil Reviews – Does It Silence Tinnitus for Real?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Clinitron Bed Management For Flap Patients Is The Standard Of Care

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ceremony CBD Oil Reviews: Trustworthy Hemp CBD Liquid Drops?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Kansas sperm donor asked to pay child support

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Organic Green CBD Review: Is OrganicGreen Hemp CBD Oil Safe?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Rehabs Near Me Launches New Rehab Services in the US

February 25, 2021

Ginger-Powered Recoup Beverage: A Founder’s Unlikely Story of Survival and Success

February 13, 2021

What is Unix: The Base of All Operating Systems?

February 2, 2021

Categories

  • Banking
  • Bollywood
  • Brand Partner Content
  • Business
  • Cancer
  • Current
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Hollywood
  • Legal
  • Press Release
  • Technology
  • World News
  • Home
  • Press Release
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Legal
  • Business
  • Featured
  • Current

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Home